Bad partner decisions are a reflection of faulty decision criteria

As we watch our Presidential contenders select their Vice Presidential candidates, we witness their individual exercise of judgment. This one decision has the potential to reveal character flaws, if we know what to look for. The same is equally true when a Salesperson selects a partner to round out their solution. This one decision holds the potential to “make” or “break” the election or buying decision.

The secret is not to look at the VP candidate, but to look at the decision itself. It is not “who” is picked, but “how” they are picked. This decision will be made from one of only two approaches, and the approach taken can expose the true nature and character of the decision maker. It is one of those rare moments where character meets reality in broad daylight and we get a privileged glimpse into the hidden motives of the decision making candidate. Smart voters, like smart buyers, will take full advantage of moments like this.

Are you ready? Can you “read” the decision? Do you really want to know a person’s true and often hidden character? Click here to download a quick-read article. It might determine for whom you will vote.

Which of these two approaches do you believe were used by Barack Obama and John McCain to select their Vice-Presidential running mates?

Philosophical Extension: The selection was mostly based on the VP sharing the same value system, so in case something awful happens (God forbid), his values will transcend his life through the Vice President who then becomes President.

Voter Magnetism: The selection was mostly based on the VP candidate bringing new voters from geographies and/or demographics needed to win the election.

Submit your choices via the polls at the right --->